If each younger generation *does* hand themselves something unsustainably expensive, each subsequent generation that winds up paying for it (in part) may feel increasingly pressed to do the same for themselves, even at the risk of perpetuating the cycle into full-on death spiral
-
-
I suspect that somewhat over-considering the elderly may be preferable, if it prevents any initial mass coffer grab post-realization that one's final years will be a simultaneous descent into physical, psychological & financial helplessness unless they grab what they can now
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Everyone likes stuff that transfers resources to them rather than increasing growth. It's easier to accomplish and easier to measure, plus it stokes the envy component of the mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes, what I'm trying to get at is "avoid anti-growth death spirals at all costs." I actually do think the younger gens are currently at an untenable disadvantage, but they haven't yet seen the social safety net fully crumble & it seems to me that that's what's preventing panic
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @asglidden and
My argument is contingent on things getting noticeably worse for the elderly, either in fact or in the shared narrative. IMO, policies extreme enough to risk triggering a cash grab predicated on the perception of a zero sum game are v risky, even if $ flows in the right direction
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I think we're *probably* becoming increasingly susceptible to this sort of death spiral as fertility rates drop and familial + communal safety nets break down, making us increasingly dependent on personal ability + the state, especially in old age when the former declines rapidly
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.