"So one way of extending political time horizons and increasing is to age-weight votes. The idea is that younger people would get more heavily weighted votes than older people, very roughly in proportion with life expectancy."https://medium.com/@william.macaskill/age-weighted-voting-8651b2a353cc …
-
-
Won't that be pointless because it will just be overturned once they represent a smaller fraction of all votes? Unless they try to change the voting system itself to privilege a particular birth cohort.
-
You see this sort of thing all the time in US politics: trying to mess with the gears of the system to benefit your cohort, knowing that (a) doing stuff tends to be easier than undoing stuff, & (b) everyone else is going to do the same, might as well hope they're less clever
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Up against, at least, two forces from each extreme. Human prefrontal cortex is not fully developed until ~25-30yrs https://bigthink.com/mind-brain/adult-brain … As we continue to age, if not careful (even then not 100% effective) cognitive biases can entrench themselves deep! https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-cognitive-bias-2794963 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I expect it'd depend on the cultural narrative re: economic growth. In periods of high perceived growth with a salient working eldercare scheme, I'd expect resistance. In periods of low growth, I'd expect cohorts to anticipate getting screwed & seek opportunities to hoard value
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.