One thing society needs to get right is not screwing over slow thinkers from day 1. A slow thinker can sometimes generate amazing projects over remarkably short timelines, but deliver "meh" performances on standardized tests that use time pressure to fit scores to a bell curve
-
Show this thread
-
I think a lot of people just assume that human populations somehow fit a bell curve neatly over various traits, but many of these tests are *designed* to clean up the curve by tweaking test items until beta populations fall along the right line
1 reply 3 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
This might mean adding redundant "easy" questions to push more low-scorers up to the middle or using time pressure to push slower readers/thinkers down to the middle, depending on how the curve looks on initial tests. Or vice versa.
3 replies 0 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
The problem isn't that high-scorers are bad at the thing that's being tested for, it's that there may be some or many folks scoring in the middle who are equally good or better. When you tweak items to produce a desired curve, you muddy the waters re: what the test actually tests
2 replies 3 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
If top scorers *are* really good *and* really fast, isn't that fine? Well, no. In the real world, cognitively-demanding work isn't a speed run. If top scorers get the best opportunities, people w/ traits preferable to speed (creativity, conscientiousness, etc.) may get pushed out
3 replies 3 retweets 57 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
How can we better test slow traits? Take homes? Trial periods?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Both are a bit better, and both seem to be spreading (across the tech sector, at least). Both are quite a lot closer to resembling the actual demands of the work, with the latter being *extremely* close but of course much more costly
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @TrevorVossberg
Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ Retweeted Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️
What we *really* need: better early filters. Something that can reduce the applicant pool from 300 to 30 without throwing the baby out with the bathwaterhttps://twitter.com/webdevmason/status/1153732472275738624?s=21 …
Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ added,
Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ @webdevMasonReplying to @davidklaingIMO there's likely room for a company to experiment with untimed tests (within reason) that reveal exceptional thinkers systemically missed by the current standard. Especially if shown to cover multiple useful traits. If it worked well, it'd be *extremely* valuable to recruiters0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.