You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Filter bubbles. IDW people hear each other on many topics, but outsiders only hear the small fraction that's edgy enough to inspire outrage.
It's not even that. They're not climate scientists. The point is that climate scientists need to be able to speak freely. They're doing what they believe to be what they are positioned to do toward that end. I have no idea why people miss this
I think people don't find it credible that the character of debates that are inherently deeply linked to identity are at all connected to the character of debates only connected to identity via accidental affiliation.
It just seems like a boil-the-oceans strategy. "I'd like people to yell less about important civilizational things, so to do that, I'm going to try to get them to yell less about the things they are most emotional about that have the least consequence."
Is there a single solitary example of a climate scientist who was unable to say what they needed to due to restrictions imposed by SJWs? The issue with line of argument is that it’s so far from reality it’s hard to take seriously.
The idea that SJW culture could lead to an environment in which scientists aren’t able to solve these problems is an extreme slippery slope argument. It’s a worst case hypothetical. Is it reasonable to prioritize a hypothetical over the very real problems facing society?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
