You’d think the “I Won Jeopardy, Now Pay Attention to Me” guy would be more interested in the science of human behaviorhttps://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1148859958491881472 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @kittypurrzog
I doubt Chu has ever listened to "the other side" except through distorted lenses provided by "allies." As I understand it, the "gender critical" perspective — whatever one thinks of it — has never denied masculinity/femininity, wide variation within sexes, or genetic influences
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @kittypurrzog
The problem is that "gender critical" mostly refers to a heterogenous political coalition which includes perspectives that do deny genetic influences on psychology: radfems "traditionally" identify the roots of women's oppression in physiological differences plus culture
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zackmdavis @kittypurrzog
there's a colon in there, but it sure doesn't look to me like it has much of a job to do
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
tbc, I haven't read a lot of feminist literature on either side, so maybe I'm missing something *especially* when it comes to historical/traditional perspectives
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I just haven't seen much evidence that I would be able to tell where someone plotted themselves on the spectrum of feminism based on their observation that a lot of lesbians play soccer & testosterone seems to have a thing or two to do with an interest and/or talent for sports
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I've certainly seen the occasional indefensible degree of "all the things are social constructions," but that territory sure doesn't belong to any one side, either
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.