You’d think the “I Won Jeopardy, Now Pay Attention to Me” guy would be more interested in the science of human behaviorhttps://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1148859958491881472 …
Show this thread
I doubt Chu has ever listened to "the other side" except through distorted lenses provided by "allies." As I understand it, the "gender critical" perspective — whatever one thinks of it — has never denied masculinity/femininity, wide variation within sexes, or genetic influences
-
-
"Gender essentialism" is this particularly peculiar thing that both sides of the issue seem to attribute to one another and not themselves. But Chu is taking this well into crazytown by implying that *any* attempt to connect genotype to phenotype is basically modern phrenology
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem is that "gender critical" mostly refers to a heterogenous political coalition which includes perspectives that do deny genetic influences on psychology: radfems "traditionally" identify the roots of women's oppression in physiological differences plus culture
-
there's a colon in there, but it sure doesn't look to me like it has much of a job to do
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.