I’m sort of concerned by the “it’s a game/LARPing” frame for Antifa v. Proud Boys — not because it’s not arguable, but because I think it confuses several possible definitions for “game.”
-
-
On the object level, I don’t think we have anything that should be understood as a game, in the colloquial sense. We have a self-selected assortment of masked people entering the public with weapons and making their own individual judgments about who to hit and how hard.
Show this thread -
On the meta level, I think we have a group-constructed fantasy where good & evil are defined on the basis of what’s available to score on & where telling stories about taking or throwing punches during planned events translates to points. *This* is a game, a profoundly stupid one
Show this thread -
Andy Ngo didn't threaten anyone physically & everyone knows it. What he threatened were the stories upon which these losers do their point-scoring. Within the meta-level game, this MUST be compressed to "Andy is a bad guy." Acknowledging the game would turn its prizes into dust.
Show this thread -
I suspect that Antifa is largely fine with the presence of journalists who *take them seriously* whether they write favorably or not. The problem with Andy isn't that he thinks they're "the bad guys," it's that he portrays them as foolish and reckless, whatever their intent.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.