This is how you get to the point where men in masks beat unarmed journalists "in self-defense." This is how you get to the point where vigilantes collectively determine which speech calls for public beatings and puzzlingly enact them under the banner of *anti*-fascism.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Obviously, there are serious costs to society when people are routinely dragged out and beaten for saying the wrong things. But there are equally serious, much less visible costs to society when people are *rarely* dragged out and beaten because they have learned to whisper.
Show this thread -
I think the delusion is that we can go on and skip ahead to the Glorious Future if everyone knows what not to say — and, necessarily, what might happen to them otherwise. The opposition does not need to *be* dead, but it better play dead convincingly. Again: "anti-"fascism.
Show this thread -
This is the axis along which I'm most opposed to the ultra-far left — "how costly should honest conversations about potentially dangerous beliefs be?" The cost MUST be low. We cannot skip steps. Human progress cannot rest on jaws either willingly shut or forcefully broken.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
transitive, commutative, and associative all at the same time
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
press esc
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.