This is a different criticism than the one that is often made by IDW members though I feel. A few of the news sites that you posted a screencap of actually lean conservative (NY Post, Washington Examiner). Yet there is often a very clear political label attached to this criticism
-
-
Replying to @_w0bi
I guess I can't do more than just refer you back to my first tweet and offer to agree to disagree on what the IDW is
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason
I definitely agree with you that there are people in the IDW that are essentially just doing it to decentralize narratives. That's all fine, but you still have a significant amount of people who pander even more recklessly than any "mainstream media" source. E.g.
@RubinReport1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_w0bi @RubinReport
You're doing something really interesting over the last several tweets and I'm wondering if you've noticed it
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @_w0bi @RubinReport
You're acknowledging that you understand that I'm trying to play the meta game, but giving me nothing to respond to that won't drag me back into the object-level game. That's why we're trapped in a loop where I can't do anything except tread water while pointing at the meta game
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @RubinReport
Maybe we are actually not that far apart. I think the IDW is right about the decline of traditional media and is often right to criticize some of its properties. Yet an intellectually honest person would then go on and police the "alternative media" just as much or more for sim.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_w0bi @RubinReport
To police the "alternative media" just as much is to acknowledge that /u/50Shades is functionally equivalent to the New York Times, which is something I don't think any of the IDW folks are comfortable doing
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @RubinReport
Yes, but there are plenty of examples of Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson or similar people being deceptive as fuck and they don't get the same full-frontal treatment that the mainstream media gets even though the people that get their news or politics from them are probably more
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
likely to believe them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I really don't believe that Jordan Peterson ever intends to deceive, though he may be wrong and certainly hyperbolic. I don't think there's ever been any hesitation within the IDW to talk openly about disagreement. There's a lot of it.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @RubinReport
I don't know whether JP intends to deceive or not, but I don't know that about the media either. The disagreement happens over safe issues", not over the ones that define the IDW. For example many of JP's claims about C-16 were wildly exaggerated, no criticism as of yet from IDW.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(That I know of, if you have something please link it to me)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.