I've come to see self-loathing and outward-facing resentment as just two strategies for shielding oneself from empowerment in a context where it is safer to be weak than to be strong.
-
Show this thread
-
Further, it's impossible to play with the world with genuine curiosity and not be at great risk of becoming powerful. So that, too, must be squashed.
3 replies 6 retweets 62 likesShow this thread -
The greatest gift any human being can give any other human being is a genuine, unwavering desire & commitment to see them become strong.
5 replies 26 retweets 133 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
which strength? of hundred of types many directly contradict one another. F.ex, a success.ful capitalist like Bill Gates could be easily manhandled by men who live on the brink of poverty. You don't get how value systems work. Strenght as a value is only an appeal to the given
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PiotrSalomon @webdevMason
hierarchy of power, just like value of money is an appeal to the hierarchy of capital.Both are pointless empty metrics without the structure of violence that sustains them. Strength has meaning only in a given hierarchy of violence, and as such is a VERY POOR keystone for ethics
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PiotrSalomon @webdevMason
If resentment & self-loathing are strategies, and they succeed, they are signs of resilience and perseverance so they can be argued do be a kind of strength which goes against the ethics of strength. Your thought is internally contradictory bc. it has single dimension/value.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
They succeed at precisely the goal I ascribed to them. Best of luck, friend.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.