Probably because return data doesn’t support it Tragicallyhttps://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/1039311534525042689 …
-
-
Replying to @birsic
If you believe you can beat the market and then you don't, your returns are telling you *something,* and it's up to you to interpet that in a way that doesn't leave you shirtless
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason
I believe so much in the dynamic you described that there’s a good chance I start a company soon to address it. That said, given today’s funding reality you have to believe LPs of VC firms are either really, really dumb, or heartless capitalists. I believe the latter.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @birsic
An LP who's getting enviable returns is probably not really, really dumb. Probably pretty capitalist, probably not particularly heartless or sentimental. I think you may have misread my claim, or stuffed it with a little more sugar than the [very simple] recipe called for
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @birsic
I'm not aware of any body of data that contradicts the claim that returns will generally be higher (as a function of initial investment) for those who win that were most undervalued at the point of investment
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
So generally I assume that when someone says there *is* such data, they're talking about some other kind of expectation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.