IMO, many of these pundits can't grok it when they see strong disagreeableness function well within a frame of mutual respect, nor do they possess the kind of systems thinking required to probe their own models rather than assume incoherence when they find themselves confusedhttps://twitter.com/HeatherEHeying/status/1134336441549434881 …
-
-
Much of said recent point-scoring is also far too focused on people/groups, rather than ideas, to solve any actual problems.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have a tendency to discount argument with increasing strength of disagreement, as the strength of certainty appropriate for a strong disagreement requires a degree of rigor - which without evidence of that taken place well strong disagreements are an indicator for unreasonable.
-
Hmm, IMO there's an important distinction between the axes "appropriate confidence ranges" and "perceived appropriateness of strength/weakness of claim/value." The Overton window affects both, but especially the latter, and it doesn't feel like it ought to be so context-dependent
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.