Why in DMs?
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason
Either way is fine. DMs just feel like a better UI for actual conversation
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EvanSandhoefner
It just seems strange to ask a *bunch* of questions publically and then try to move actual discussion into a private channel. I am much happier to discuss what I consider a poor frame proposed in public... in public
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason
Okay! So, do you have a crisp and clear definition of IDW that you like?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EvanSandhoefner
Nope -- for the same reason don't I have a clear definition of "happy people," "good thinkers," or even "my friends." (All of these are actually fuzzier.) I have crisp definitions for groups certified by top-down organizations, and I don't think those rule the day.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason
So, is it "I know it when I see it" or are people only IDW if they voluntarily self-identify as such?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EvanSandhoefner
You'll see some variability in the way people apply the label -- just as you do for e.g. "rationalists" and "effective altruists." I tend to think of both a little differently depending on context
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @EvanSandhoefner
Do you not find the term cringe inducing at all?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Intrinsic29 @EvanSandhoefner
No, I find "cringe-inducing" cringe-inducing. It's the idiotic terms mean girls use when they're tired of calling people they don't like "creepy"
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Generally speaking, I'm against any of those terms presented as though the justification is beyond question. That's the territory of weird social games that everyone is better off not playing.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 7 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.