On intelligence & IQhttps://www.pscp.tv/w/b7DSEDFWR2p2cUFYUlllS098MWRSSlpta1BRck1HQiPaAXczH1pEGvCjxYyo-c89ueVAavqGxem6NWuLCoxZ …
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason
There are “cognitive skills” that contribute to “intelligence”. So then the question is: are those skills a certain kind of knowledge that can be learned?
7 replies 4 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @ToKTeacher
AFAICT some can be, and many probably cannot be *yet,* and others possibly can't be unless you alter the brain. But it's early days and hard to know. Can aphantasiacs learn to create mental imagery? Not yet, maybe in the future (many have visual dreams!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason
Some things some people can do, in principle others cannot...on that view. So the human mind is *not* universal, then.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ToKTeacher
I'm saying: - there can be damage or limitations on the hardware layer - human beings living today have access to a very small set of all possible inputs *and* all possible forms of input; this obscures what is possible in principle, but still means hard practical limitations
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @ToKTeacher
tbc, my laptop can do things that I'm fairly confident I could spend a lifetime attempting to no avail. My computer can read 13,264,635 lines like these & translate them into 35 minutes of synced audio + video. A human brain structure can do this in principle, but mine cannot.pic.twitter.com/RrCOy6LObH
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @ToKTeacher
Say you got passionate about doing that & it took you 50 years. You'd get faster as you went along, right? How long would the fastest-brained human take? 25 years? Take two humans who want to do it. What's the main factor affecting who'll finish first: brain speed or passion?
2 replies 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @DavidDeutschOxf @ToKTeacher
I don't know how to estimate that. Maybe 25 years? Maybe 100 years? Does it matter where the human lifespan falls at the point the attempt is made? It's a distraction.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Also have to ask what the correlation between being good at something and being passionate is, right? (anecdotally, I find it hard to get excited about stuff I suck at)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Most think they suck at stuff because they just do and thus they aren't excited about those things. Actually? They aren't excited about those things first...so then they suck at them. Sucking is never a reflection of someone's intelligence. It's just about what they find fun.
3 replies 4 retweets 17 likes
Becoming excited about x is contingent on exposure to x; the most relevant + frustrating feature of modern ed systems is that they insist on strong labels for medicore content: people wind up believing they've been exposed to broad swaths of the territory that they haven't seen
-
-
I guess most of what people are exposed to is to be found outside the school gates. Except for a particular kind of coercion that largely only exists inside them. One day I expect it will be different and “teacher” really will be “servant/kind employee of the learner”.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Recently I heard
@PhilipPullman say that the function of a 'teacher' should be like that of an editor vis a vis an author. Yes.2 replies 4 retweets 22 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 8 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.