On intelligence & IQhttps://www.pscp.tv/w/b7DSEDFWR2p2cUFYUlllS098MWRSSlpta1BRck1HQiPaAXczH1pEGvCjxYyo-c89ueVAavqGxem6NWuLCoxZ …
-
I'm saying: - there can be damage or limitations on the hardware layer - human beings living today have access to a very small set of all possible inputs *and* all possible forms of input; this obscures what is possible in principle, but still means hard practical limitations
tbc, my laptop can do things that I'm fairly confident I could spend a lifetime attempting to no avail. My computer can read 13,264,635 lines like these & translate them into 35 minutes of synced audio + video. A human brain structure can do this in principle, but mine cannot.pic.twitter.com/RrCOy6LObH
-
-
Say you got passionate about doing that & it took you 50 years. You'd get faster as you went along, right? How long would the fastest-brained human take? 25 years? Take two humans who want to do it. What's the main factor affecting who'll finish first: brain speed or passion?
-
I don't know how to estimate that. Maybe 25 years? Maybe 100 years? Does it matter where the human lifespan falls at the point the attempt is made? It's a distraction.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't that a lack of speed and memory? My guess is that if you had the same computational power you could if you wanted to. The logic by which it's done is not fundamentaly different.
-
Yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.