Most Americans roughly agree on abortion if allowed to express a nuanced, intermediate position. The question becomes intractable due to political gamesmanship in which the fringes jointly stigmatize the center out of existence. #ExcludedMiddle #AlabamaAbortionBan
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @BretWeinstein
— I have to believe bright-liners are just signaling. Nobody of sound mind would rush into a burning fertility clinic to rescue the embryos rather than the staff/patients, nor consider it fine for a woman to induce at 24 weeks & birth a disabled child just to be done with it.2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @BretWeinstein
How many of the 64+ million abortions would fit into those categories though. And if you won’t accept the bright lines, which circular-reasoning-based line will you adopt?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jvmitsgoodtohav @BretWeinstein
It's possible to argue that a *legal* bright line works because edge cases are so rare that the practical outcome is desirable. But in that case, you're favoring a somewhat more nuanced rule; you're just not stating it explicitly because you don't know precisely what it is.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The risk is that you end up underestimating and/or avoiding evidence of edge cases because it messes with your bright line, and you don't really know where to go from there.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Don't want to get into my personal opinion on abortion, nor do I think I have the expertise required to write the law, but I don't believe that a zygote should be considered a person at conception & I don't believe that bodily autonomy is a right that always supersedes all others
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.