The most popular conspiracy theory in the US today is that American wealth is the result of a steady cabalistic transfer of extant wealth from the poor and middle class to "like 10 people" at the "tippy top." It's provably false but will define the next several election cycleshttps://twitter.com/AOC/status/1127270688925134849 …
-
Show this thread
-
Take a look at what AOC is pointing out: for-profit prisons, student loans, "tricking the country into war," abusing food stamp programs. Notice a theme? Prisons are a product for governments. Rich people do not declare wars or issue food stamps. Student loans are backed by whom?
12 replies 14 retweets 125 likesShow this thread -
The trap I *don't* want to fall into is claiming that all is well. Wages have stagnated while healthcare and higher ed pricing skyrocketed, and both systems are regulatory fortresses. Regulatory capture via licensure and accreditation is locking in profit for the current players
6 replies 5 retweets 107 likesShow this thread -
The healthcare/education monster is unavoidably a private interest + government collaboration. Moreover, the collaboration has grown so complex and labyrinthian that it's unclear how to attack it. And it's moot anyway, unless it sounds better than "boo yachts, free college!"
2 replies 5 retweets 74 likesShow this thread -
Here's what worries me: whether via a punitive income tax bracket or a wealth tax, you're hitting a group that contains some game-players and many more value-creators. If you don't first solve the regulatory capture issue, you funnel the gains straight back to the game-players.
2 replies 7 retweets 80 likesShow this thread -
If we bet on a policy as aggressive as Warren's wealth tax, it'd become nearly impossible for ultra-successful entrepreneurs to maintain controlling stakes in their own companies over 1-2 decades. It should not be controversial to say this would be disastrous for the US economy.
7 replies 10 retweets 91 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
I think this IS controversial. I would counter that entrepreneurs are rarely effective over many decades, and children inheriting are nearly always incompetent. You could tax quite hard without changing the incentives in the system if you were careful?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SamuelVimes10
Oh, FFS. It doesn't matter whether you think entrepreneurs are incompetent to run their companies for more than 10 years or so if they say, "fuck you, I'm not starting a company somewhere I don't get to keep it." It's like people have forgotten that airplanes exist or something
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
It is truly a testament to American exceptionalism that we believe we can actually institutionalize the concept that founders can't be trusted with their own ideas and expect them to stick around for longer than a single hot minute
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @SamuelVimes10
If indeed incompetent heirs lose their wealth to the general economy, then you get redistribution anyway. The wealth will then concentrate w/in the control of the capable capitalists/founders and they will build up new industry that generates products, jobs, and tax revenue.
0 replies 1 retweet 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.