Why is that? I don't see the Motte and Bailey here. Both are socially constructed, neither of which confers a moral value on the construction. Indeed, in the case of both gender and math, it invites criticism that long held beliefs that are held to be may not be true
-
-
Personally: I think it's silly to deny that there are ground mathematical truths, I think using the phrase "social construct" is v misleading on many of these layers, I don't think that facts care about your feelings, but I do think gender is complex & feelings matter a whole lot
-
I think ground mathematical truths are so buried in erudite axiomatic theories as to be useless to talk about! The ground truths are boring and even things like "not not P implies P" are serious contentious issues in modern math!
- 27 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, as someone who prefers constructive mathematics and is dismayed by the excluded middle (and genuinely has that belief about computable numbers above), I am not choosing my epistemology to spite the other side.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
FWIW I just don't think one's understanding of what math is has to imply anything about social ideology