Mason  🏃‍♂️ ✂️

I'm sorry, where was that on your chart? If you want to get into the real shit, let's get into the real shit. How many human beings need to die or be sterilized to prevent ecological collapse?

"Slow population growth & consumption to try and avoid mass suffering in the near future and possible extinction" != "murder & sterilize people." It's insane that people who claim to value human life so much ignore that business as usual dooms billions to displacement or death

Go find someone who's defending business as usual.

as far as i can tell you're defending continued exponential growth in population and consumption, sooooo

Business as usual is plummeting birth rates in high-education hubs, an adamant aesthetic-based dismissal of key technologies to reverse the most concerning of the trends you point at, and a broad shift toward an agrarian sensibility that is *less* sustainable at a *lower* pop.

go find someone engaging in "aesthetic-based dismissal of key technologies to reverse the most concerning of the trends." we should dump asstons of money into all kinds of tech. But we also shouldn't have blind faith that it'll succeed & use it as justification for exp. growth

A population implosion in the parts of the world with functional tech hubs would decimate the funding available for this tech & the projects available to fund. There is no non-migratory growth here, and your arguments aren't super persuasive to Niger, Somalia, the Congo.

Tell yourself a voluntary fertility decline is some kind of solution, but we already have that in the richer parts of the world. Keep talking just to hear yourself, or go look up the countries with the top birth rates & think about how you're going to pitch green hipsterism there