Earlier theories related to the Damorian variability hypothesis were along the lines of head size and phrenology. All shared the common feature of working backwards from the desired conclusion.
-
Show this thread
-
And all failed to correctly predict the dramatic shift in demographics of the scientific community, or to explain why the variability hypothesis only seems to apply to humans and not other animals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
For example, there's no observed difference in intelligence or learning ability across dog breeds, despite the size of dog breeds ranging between 4 lbs (Chihuahua) and 250 lbs (English Mastiff).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @octonion
Where are you getting that from? This may be true for social memory or very simple, discrete tasks, but there are certainly some varieties of work and competition that require the dog to make quick judgments, and there are typically a small handful of breeds that excel.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason
That's folklore. Working dogs are traditionally chosen for very simple reasons, including tradition, size and strength.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @octonion
Working dogs have been selectively bred to do both physically and cognitively challenging work for hundreds of years. Within- and between-group differences in trainability and ability to work under conditions of uncertainty are very well established.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason
You can keep repeating it, but it doesn't make it true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Okay, but what evidence do you have for believing otherwise? A tremendous number of professionals would have to be completely mistaken, and intelligence, cognitive speed, and any temperamental traits that mediate the expression of cognition would have to be 0% heritable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.