the other is @webdevMason, who seems to have a heightened sensitivity to children’s growing minds (in some way that i’d love to hear her try to put into words)
-
-
The typical school lumps a bunch of similarly-aged kids together and tells them what they ought to be able to do if they're not lazy and stupid. Did you go undiagnosed for 20 years without the slightest idea you could use some support? Of course not. You had to try to hide it.
-
Kids are naturally "lumpy" — they're stronger in some areas than others, they don't all intuit the same way, and they do depth-first searches if they're given any opportunity at all to purse their own interests. It's why most end up thinking they're dumb, at one time or another.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The literature delineates extrinsic & intrinsic motivators: rewards for good performance or behavior may actually diminish long-run progress. What doesn't seem well-studied is whether the teacher-student relationship matters... which seems a pretty dense blind spot, IMO
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Especially as a kid! I think we forget. Left to themselves, kids put tremendous effort into what they do. They wreck themselves attempting skateboard tricks. They spend hours revising lego structures. This is part of a drawing I did as a teen — where did that patience come from?!pic.twitter.com/mRHhhRXET5
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.