Universities actually cram very little information into students, and they do it painfully slowly. Bad pedagogy leaves only crude brute force study methods viable; profs have to limit the scope if they want to keep their students happy enough to not bash them on Rate My Professorhttps://twitter.com/TheAyenem/status/1116771886132813825 …
-
Show this thread
-
I'm not denying that some students study very hard, or that some programs require something like an order of magnitude more content to be retained in the short- to medium-term. Just that there is a hard limit on how much content can be crammed this way, and it's a low ceiling
1 reply 1 retweet 22 likesShow this thread -
If it feels like school is an all-consuming slog, that's the feeling of fighting your brain -- which builds models, and has to consume and discard massive volumes of extraneous information. "This isn't extraneous!" It doesn't believe you, and you don't really believe you, either
4 replies 5 retweets 79 likesShow this thread -
I should note that there are (probably broadly trainable) strategies for massively improved rote memorization, but the very hacky way this works makes me very skeptical that information stored this way can be accessed for much more than basic call-and-response
6 replies 1 retweet 40 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
(1) Tangentially, we did lose something when we moved away from 'classical' education techniques, even if we weren't aware then what those things were. From Norman Doidge's excellent The Brain that Changes Itself:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Belgarvm @webdevMason
(2) "For hundreds of years educators did seem to sense that children's brains had to be built up through exercises of increasing difficulty that strengthened brain functions. Up through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries a classical education often included rote...
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Belgarvm @webdevMason
(3) ...memorization of long poems in foreign languages, which strengthened the auditory memory (hence thinking in language) and an almost fanatical attention to handwriting, which probably helped strengthen motor capacities and thus not only helped handwriting but added speed...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Belgarvm @webdevMason
(4) ...and fluency to reading and speaking. Often a great deal of attention was paid to exact elocution and to perfecting the pronunciation of words... the loss of these drills has been costly; they may have been the only opportunity that many students had to systematically...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Belgarvm @webdevMason
(5) ... exercise the brain function that gives us fluency and grace with symbols."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Belgarvm
This strikes me an egregious misunderstanding of both the brain and the history of education, which at points did include a great deal more compulsory rote memorization — but was also (variably) mixed-age, limited by social class, inclusive of *severe* corporal punishment, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
This reminds me of an old Harvard admissions doc that floats around, which looks terribly difficult — Latin translations! Greek grammar! Obscure geographical trivia! — but which, on reflection, requires absolutely zero critical thinking or non-procedural problem-solving.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @Belgarvm
A century ago and beyond, it was sensible for the upper class to turn their youth into encyclopedias — books were expensive, unwieldy, unsearchable. And while class culture wasn't homogenous, mobility was a lot more constrained & socioeconomic status was a lot more performative.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.