Nothing that the government provides is actually 'free'.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That is to say.. outside this hypothetical we're in the odd spot that government is both less efficient, and more infringing of individual rights. I'm having trouble steel manning that the government should be doing much of anything unless it does it better.
At ground level, the claim might be "enforcing property rights is cheaper in terms of QOL than not enforcing property rights."
