What scale do you think is implied by the article? It's very clear about the numbers and the populations afflicted.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It is certainly true that medical studies sometimes have absolutely fatal methodological errors. But it's *insane* to use that to argue that a particular study which you have not read has similar flaws.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I don't think so, but I may be wrong. My impression is that they basically tot up all the deaths that *can* be at least partially attributed to a drug resistant infection. Rather than asking how many fewer deaths/year you'd expect to see in a world with no AMR.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.