If (a) most sustained changes require a change in circumstances (not willpower) & (b) exceptional performers across activities do things qualitatively differently from typical performers, perhaps we should expect "I'll push myself to do more x for better outcomes" to usually fail
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @miikisw
My premises aren't any more or less verifiable than any other broad generalization about human behavior; my conclusion seems pretty likely to be useful if you intend to modify your behavior, but otherwise not really
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @miikisw
Also, this is not an argument resting on any logical operators; I think either (a) or (b) can support the conclusion & neither of them are sufficient separately or together to "prove" it. This is not a nail for whatever hammer you're using
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @miikisw
You don't understand my premises and I suspect you don't understand my conclusion. Between insults you haven't given me enough information to figure out exactly where the inferential gap is, so there's unfortunately not much I can do for you.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
A civil disagreement contains more content than this. I don't know what to do with "you're wrong" or "this is useless." I've tried to clarify where there was something to grab onto ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.