To be clear, I do believe it's a thing now, based on people's testimony. I just wish I understood which demographics/domains have it, since it seems so rare in my own corners of the world.
-
(FWIW my intuition is that this is not one of the main bottlenecks on innovation, and that there are lots of ways to boost innovation while also disincentivizing fraud)
I’m not sure if this is the crux, since the proposed intervention is too vague for me to parse (“reasonable cautions to hyper-driven people”) & depending on what that points to I’m not sure it’s something that has *any* effect on the perceived problem (sociopaths & cons)
-
-
Sure; I was inferring what
@jbrydle meant from the examples he gave throughout the thread, of the kind of "breaking things" he wanted society to caution people against more. -
I don’t know exactly what having “society caution against breaking things” means, but it sounds like the sort of thing that has zero effect on sociopaths & neutral-to-negative effects on non-sociopaths, no?
- 21 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.