You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
What is or is not “emotionally healthy” has IMO been one of the least goal-oriented long-running public discussions. People make arguments that culiminate in “that’s not healthy” without ever describing what emotional “health” is or why it’s bad to not have it https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1104896184672382976 …
Now that I think of it, “emotional health” might be the astrology of neurology. Psychology & even psychiatry haven’t ever been as rigorous as one would hope, but “emotional health” is the phrase to use when you want to gesture at the stars & tell stories
People tend to say it’s unhealthy when I use anger to cope with situations that frustrate me. But when the anger subsides, I feel balanced.
But do the people around you feel that way? I think the justification is that we’re lessening the harm we do to other people (within reason).
From my perch it looks like many proponents of emotional health want others to move on from reacting with anger to quite so many situations. That seems goal-oriented. There is clearly also a lot of ambiguity.
...and cry.
Or point to developmental process or impediments to such processes or *growth* ( rational, intellectual, emotional, empathic, interspersonal, transpersonal, range and depth of capacity and quality of experience etc.) Note that I am agreeing w you.
I think of it as: emotionally unhealthy- when ones emotional response to something creates new problems or inflates the original one.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
