Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
webdevMason's profile
Mason 🏃‍♂️✂️
Mason 🏃‍♂️✂️
Mason  🏃‍♂️ ✂️
@webdevMason

Tweets

Mason  🏃‍♂️ ✂️

@webdevMason

LA → Oakland
calendly.com/masonhartman
Joined July 2015

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Ruminorang

      This is a broken framing of the problem. There are deeper principles that undergird our common articulations of "American founding principles". The "freedom of speech" as generally conceived and understood is couched in many assumptions about the memetic environment.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang

      Jack & Zuck have created platforms which really exacerbate the problems and highlight just how broken those assumptions are. If you're going to start policing content policies of Twitter, why not then also Fox News & Brietbart?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang

      Remember: It was Republicans that got rid of the "equal time" policy on the public airwaves. At least then, we understood that there was finite bandwidth & public attention, and journalism had to adhere to basic standards in order to have a right to the spectrum.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang

      Modern tech has aggregated and sliced up the ENTIRE AGGREGATE attention space of society, and pro-business, anti-regulation, VC bubble mentality means that it's somehow un-American to ask if that mere act of technology is a good and proper thing to do to a society.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang

      BTW @webdevMason this is what I meant by "attention is a commons". Any individual's attention surely belongs to themselves. But if tech can aggregate the bulk of the collective attention span of most people, then that system - an attention market, a broadcast tool - is a commons.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang @webdevMason

      If we don't treat it as a commons, then we have no business sniping individual players of that attention economy and saying, "Jack you are an asshole for censoring right-wing shitposts", while ignoring Brietbart & Rush Limbaugh.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang @webdevMason

      If we treat it as a commons, then we have the basis for holistically tackling the whole enchilada. We might even conclude that massively scaled reach is *intrinsically* problematic, and disallow such technology (e.g. by rendering it liable to libel lawsuits, etc.).

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang @webdevMason

      The only reason the platforms can grow the way they did is because of certain legal safe harbor (e.g. CDA 230) and a lack of case law that held them liable for the things they facilitated. A couple of cyberbullying lawsuits with hefty fines could really change things.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Mason  🏃‍♂️ ✂️‏ @webdevMason 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang

      Brietbart & Rush Limbaugh are indeed liable for the content they serve in a way that e.g. email service providers are not. Taking an increasingly active role in shaping the discussion likely does push them toward the legal territory of the former & thus seems dumb ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @webdevMason @Ruminorang

      Under normal circumstances, Email doesn’t amplify without attribution (ie the emails come from *someone*), and the exploitation of SMTP to achieve amplification/reach without accountability has a name: spam.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Mason  🏃‍♂️ ✂️‏ @webdevMason 6 Mar 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @pwang @Ruminorang

      “Spam” isn’t about amplification/reach without accountability, it’s about amplification/reach without consent. You don’t have to know who a listserv belongs to in order to consent to receipt

      9:21 AM - 6 Mar 2019
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. Peter Wang‏ @pwang 6 Mar 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @webdevMason @Ruminorang

          You’re right, lack of consent is a critical design failure of email (and Twitter, too). But open relays were also a failure of the original design. Either of {accountability of origin, consent of receipt} would have been sufficient to nip the spam problem.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info