This has everything to do with taxpayers paying for research they aren't permitted to read and undergrads selling out their futures for not-eve-n-passable educations from researchers who have little to no incentive to teach them anything. Wake. Up.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason
As someone who has been through the university, earned a PhD, got grants, published, worked for startups, and now works for a large publisher, is it reasonable to think that I might be more informed than the average person on this topic?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason
I can articulate the value to society more generally, as well. Would you like to hear it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @webdevMason
New technologies, cures for diseases, better policy, & understanding of the world in general come about through academic research. Academic research is facilitated by sharing of trustworthy, high signal to noise ratio knowledge among academics.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mrgunn
I am not questioning the value of scientific research. I am questioning the value of a system that limits access to publicly-funded research to a tiny few, incentivizes positive results + overstated conclusions, & appears to be producing less notable work at an increasing cost
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason
mrgunn Retweeted mrgunn
So there's a both a tremendous amount and not enough being done to address publication bias & that's a whole separate thread, but I do want to point out that there's a difference between research and the publication thereof. That's what I was getting at
https://twitter.com/mrgunn/status/1101580949555310592 …mrgunn added,
mrgunn @mrgunnReplying to @mrgunn @webdevMasonPublishing is a way to keep the signal to noise ratio high, ensure ethical standards are adhered to, raw data & code are made available, and that the papers use relatively readable language. I always feel like the role of the editor is overlooked in these discussions.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Funny, because when you asserted your far superior understanding of “the value of academic publishing,” I was actually expecting a defense of that and not of literally all research.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason
The argument I'm making is essentially: research is important, publishing facilitates research, so publishing is important. There are other ways to facilitate it, too, but publishing is a big one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mrgunn @webdevMason
I eagerly followed this conversation hoping for something more substantial than this. I’m pretty sure any person who seriously cares about dismantling the publishing-industrial complex, cares in part because they recognize that research is important & should be accessible to all
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.