Too many bad takes built on reductive ideas about why people do what they do, especially online — less, I think, because they have useful explanatory power, and more because they allow people to skip entirely the layer containing desires they don’t endorse or fully understandhttps://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1092064394920349697 …
-
-
Ah ok, then maybe my disagreement is just with
@primalpoly's model of what causes people's self-reported addiction to Twitter (that I thought you were endorsing), which doesn't fully match my experiencehttps://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1092064394920349697 … -
In my model, I would still feel a significant amount of the "must open Twitter, must refresh, must click notifications, must scroll" urge even if all of the content was drama-free. The dopamine hits come from some combination of novelty + approval (from the notifications)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Would you say it's possible for the brain's reward system to be hacked?
-
I'm saying I don't see a meaningful difference between having a reward system at all and having one that's *constantly* "hacked."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think the "hacking my brain's reward system" idea is useful for explaining scenarios where the design of something causes you to fall into situations where you do things w/ a feeling of internal conflict (i.e., desiring to use Twitter when some part of you doesn't want to)
-
Feeling a desire to hug your significant other doesn't (usually) involve that internal conflict.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.