Your thoughts on Twitter, YouTube et al re: denying access?
-
-
Replying to @Fishinthemirage
IMO it’s usually unreasonable to characterize a top player who relies on network effects to win as a monopoly. These products are more fragile than they look; they’re more susceptible to collective action than anything else. This is why they always have to try to play every side
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @Fishinthemirage
The fact that everyone agrees these policies are dumb — they’re either too soft on the bad guys, or too quick to appease arbitrary mobs — is probably not actually a terrible thing. It means they’re utterly at the mercy of their consumers
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason
What do you think about these platforms ability to pick winners and losers by granting or denying access to competing businesses?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason
Alex Jones runs a media business. YouTube, Twitter et al have denied him access to their platforms.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @webdevMason
Depends on who ya talk to
But seriously...if we agree that YouTube et al can be defined as bottlenecks to the public...and we agree that a media business is dependent on same...they can have disproportionate impact on outcomes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Bottlenecks to the public? Because the public widely uses their products?
-
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.