Mason  🏃‍♂️ ✂️

"Almost all" is one of those key words on a multiple choice test that you know means "false." See Sweden, Finland, Belgium, Portugal...etc.

I'll grant that you do sound like someone who's taken a lot of multiple-choice tests

If a "to-the-man" attack is the best can you can come up with, then it's clear your logic was faulty. Try again.

Fair enough, but wealth taxes aren't the only way to ensure that Warren Buffet doesn't pay a lower percentage than his secretary. The real question is: do you cede the point that extreme income inequality has become a national security threat (not to mention an ethical failure)?

National security threat? No. IMO, inequality is a red herring: if everyone had the resources to live reasonably well & to not be trapped by geography or lack of training/education, it'd be fine if the rich doubled their wealth. It's the quality of life at the bottom, not the gap