Literally eternity? Then a monkey with a typewriter could get out. But someone who can't Fizzbuzz might *not* get out because they would literally never think of trying all possible solutions, or devise a valid informal iterator for them if they did.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The category “poor countries that seem to produce a lot of coders” is just a list of poor countries with very large populations. Brains suitable for coding are ~evenly distributed while opportunities are not.
1 reply 0 retweets 27 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"anyone can learn to do it" "Higher than average IQ and passionate interest is all that's needed"
2 replies 0 retweets 69 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, because "I can't perform the basic mental operations integral to what x *is*, but I have a passion for x" is incoherent. Passion requires some basic degree of ability. If you're arguing you can leverage a lot from there, I agree. But not everyone has even that to start with.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
IQ doesn't mean that. It's not like below a certain IQ you can't understand what an integer is. It just makes you faster at learning it. Passion means you'll devote more time to it and therefore learn faster compared to someone of equal ability without that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I am not talking about IQ.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I'm not sure. I say "brains suitable for coding" because that's the highest-resolution description that seems not-wrong. It def correlates to scores on IQ tests, cognitive reflection tests, all kinds of competitive games, etc., but also stuff like obsessiveness & energy levels
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.