Regarding wage stagflation, you might want to check your facts. Other than a few brief periods earning per capita has been going up significantly.pic.twitter.com/aEMIuhd2Pj
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
Regarding wage stagflation, you might want to check your facts. Other than a few brief periods earning per capita has been going up significantly.pic.twitter.com/aEMIuhd2Pj
My google-fu has failed me so far, there is a much more exhaustive demographic breakdown and ill try to post at a future date if i find it, but the interactive NPR graph is pretty good https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/historical-income-distribution-all-households … https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/02/349863761/40-years-of-income-inequality-in-america-in-graphs … reposting the prev one http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/07/for-most-us-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/ …
The tax policy center data tables show "after tax income %" has dropped for every quintile except the top 20%, and the gain in the top quintile is almost all the the top 1% nearly doubling 7.8>13.2% I'm sure there would be further disparity if there was a top .1% .01% etc
@JamesonHalpern
blowing up my notifications :)
any thoughts on the various sources i cited?
(Really I'm just glad someone other than John and i got through our conversation. ;)
There's some valuable discussion here.)
It appears FRED and Pew do not agree on per capita GDP/Purchasing Power.
I don't think there would be many people questioning the status quo at all if the lives the large majority of people are living was better reflected by the FRED graph than the pew/tax policy center/NPR interpretations.
Don't forget to factor in the advances in technology and productivity. In 1964 very few people had a personal computer. In 2018 the median US adult has a smart phone with more processing power and memory than the very best supercomputer of 1964. Also medical advances.
Most people in the 60s didn't have AC, ONE TV was a big deal, the washing machine was a new concept, and making a long distance phone call was a big deal. Yeah, things have gotten JUST a bit better.
aa quick check on TV prices .. shows its not that useful a metric a B+W 16" cost $259 in 1961 would cost $2157.61 in 2017 a color21" cost $495 in 1961 would cost $4123.62 in " "We got really good at making TVs" not "everyone that has a TV is better off than most people in 1960"
But that's just the point. How much would a 16" B/W TV cost in 2018? Perhaps $25 in 2018 dollars. So everyone got 100X just from technology, productivity gains, and the natural deflation that comes from healthy economic expansion. For this reason I believe the FRED graph.
All else held equal, people are better off in a world where a 32" high def color TV costs $120 than one where a 16" B&W TV costs $2,000. It remains true that many people cannot afford either, and so have no preference. One is still better. This is a critical point.
Fair enough, the extremely poor do need some welfare. However, the working/middle class can generally afford a modern TV, smartphone, and lots of other luxuries entirely unavailable 50 years ago.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.