You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It is not obvious for me that a hackathon is actually a good work sample test for professional software development. Reasons orgs would not do it: inertia, high focus cost of expensive employees, scheduling pain, pushback from desirable candidates, Schelling point issues.
That's not obvious to me, either. But it is pretty obviously better than the typical tech interview? I (seem to) interview more effectively than many friends of mine with much stronger technical skills & vastly better portfolios, and this seems dumb
So I can model our why you’d say that is better than typical job interview if you scope the “job to be done” of the job interview as a skills assessment. I think this is fundamentally not the desired output of job interviews as a business process.
This probably deserves post, but a job interview is a single stage in a multistage pipeline whose ultimate goal is, basically, “Predictably fill headcount by dates on this planning document at lowest cost without hiring more Obvious Regrets Here than our tolerance level for that”
Could this just be the result of companies selecting for interpersonal skills over technical skills? Hackathons might be more ideal for find rockstars, rather than team players.
Theory: typical tech interviews are better IQ tests than hackathons
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Tech interviews are just actually scary
