The couple you're talking about is working full-time + 25% and spending >50%(!) of their combined income on rent. If either of them loses a job or has hours cut, rent is on the line. They can't afford to split up. They can't afford to have a kid. This is a VERY tenuous situation.
-
-
“Median rent” means 50th percentile, not cheapest option available. The bottom quintile or decile of market-rate studio apartments costs well under $2,000/mo.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm really skeptical of that claim. Very few apartments are on the market under $2k in SF, let alone "well-under." And while living in a 300 sq ft hole in a sketchy area can be a stopgap, your hypothetical couple is working too many hours to have many options for ever escaping it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Currently 20 legitimate listings on Zillow for <$1600, and 60 listings of 2-bd apartments for under $3000.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
“20” “quintile or decile” Having attempted to shop in this area in roughly this bracket, I can tell you that “legitimate” lies on a very strange spectrum, and that it’s likely all of those apartments are only habitable in an essentially hypothetical sense. Give it a shot! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The bottom quintile (1/5th) of all studios costs under $2000 (55 out of 264 current listings in SF). That is affordable to anyone earning at least $18/hr.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Can you maybe see how these goal-post shifts matter? “Well under” becomes “anything under.” $15/hour becomes $18/hour. This isn’t a joke. Real people are trying to make this work, and they can’t fudge these numbers arbitrarily.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I said a couple each earning $15/hr. That is $75k/yr for a full-time 48+ hour workweek schedule that most homeowners work. This couple can afford $3200/mo in rent. There are 79 2-bdrm currently avail.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
All of these hypothetical people are paying >50% of their income toward rent and working beyond fulltime, leaving little room to seek out alternatives. There’s not a financial advisor alive who would considet this a sustainable lifestyle.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The myth that 50% income towards housing being unsustainable is a privileged/entitled perspective that assumes bing drinking, automobile ownership and daily Starbucks is a human right.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And there it is.
-
-
Jacques Moufette Retweeted Nancy Skinner
Funny, Reynolds, the data would suggest otherwise. Please read the following report by Zillow:https://twitter.com/NancySkinnerCA/status/1082729402578853888 …
Jacques Moufette added,
Nancy SkinnerVerified account @NancySkinnerCAZillow research: Homelessness climbs fast when percent of income spent on rent crosses 22%. When rent affordability goes above 32% homelessness rises rapidly. SF residents average 60% of income, San Jose 41.7%, Oakland 44.7%, compared to 28% nat’l average https://www.zillow.com/research/homelessness-rent-affordability-22247/ …0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.