Two things strike me about this doc — the intellectual hubris & lack of fallibilism required to treat many of its load-bearing claims as fact, and the clear lack of interest in understanding/caring about why “traditionally masculine” men might *want* to succeed on their own terms https://twitter.com/cjprofman/status/1082355621045944321 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Is it really that shocking that some particular demographic is statistically uninterested in paying you $200/hour to receive feedback that assumes its interests and concerns are entirely “socially constructed” and intrinsically self-destructive?
1 reply 3 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
To frame the guidelines for *the entire practice* in the terms of the feminism de jour indicates a degree of hubris that *you’d think* an organization that had homosexuality literally on the books as a mental illness not 50 years ago would be trying to avoid
4 replies 4 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
I would guess they think they're being especially compassionate and open-minded by even caring about men's issues at all. Will be curious how they respond to the backlash.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.