Two things strike me about this doc — the intellectual hubris & lack of fallibilism required to treat many of its load-bearing claims as fact, and the clear lack of interest in understanding/caring about why “traditionally masculine” men might *want* to succeed on their own terms https://twitter.com/cjprofman/status/1082355621045944321 …
-
-
To frame the guidelines for *the entire practice* in the terms of the feminism de jour indicates a degree of hubris that *you’d think* an organization that had homosexuality literally on the books as a mental illness not 50 years ago would be trying to avoid
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.