You take the ones who want a job, I'll take the ones who don't If you give me $200k & 4 years of your life I'm pretty sure I can figure out how to well-round youhttps://twitter.com/Austen/status/1075888130450894849 …
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason
Indeed, I wonder if there’s enough people who do want to get rounded and would pay to do so if it were as much more efficient than a liberal arts college as
@lambdaschool is than a stem degree. May be an opportunity to do good there1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
This is an excellent take! While I decry the gross inefficiency of the U.S. college system and strongly support alternatives, I also don't like
@AustenAllred's criticism that the system isn't sufficiently job-oriented.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @StephenPiment @Meaningness and
I think there are multiple legitimate purposes of education, and the ridiculous expense and inefficiency of the system (a relatively recent phenomenon linked to federal aid money) is orthogonal to those purposes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StephenPiment @Meaningness and
I think the higher education system in the US is sold as an institution of both career preparation and personal development, that the evidence suggests that it does a poor job of both, and that both are in high demand, for very good reasons.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @Meaningness and
Yes, exactly. And not only do we need new alternatives, we need *distinct* alternatives for pursuing these distinct goals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @StephenPiment @Meaningness and
I think Austen's point — and I think he's right — is that students *largely* justify the incredible expense of schooling with the expectation of solid career prep, and that there's a sort of bait-and-switch happening with the "it's not about jobs!" message
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @Meaningness and
I agree that this bait-and-switch goes on and that it's terrible. But it's also true that liberal education, rather than jobs, was the original purpose of universities and was clearly understood as such from their invention in the 13th century down to World War II.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That's the lighter framing for it; the darker side is that it was primarily a kingmaking institution, which is why historically access was limited not only to the very wealthy but the high-status. Legacy admission rates to the best schools betray this, still.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @Meaningness and
Yes, indeed. All of this makes a great target for disruption by less expensive, more efficient alternatives.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.