Yep. There are probably *some* core books that just about everyone should read, but life is short and context matters a whole bunch — not just who you are, but who you are *right now*, what you already know & find yourself thinking about. Still... starting points!
-
-
Replying to @TheAnnaGat @visakanv and
Sort of, and individual taste/preferences are probably not completely irrelevant, but... some works really are particularly good at conveying concepts (a) clearly and (b) in a way that turns them into toys, rather than drab curiosities
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TheAnnaGat @visakanv and
To me it implies nothing more or less than that there are better and worse ways to explain things, ways that inspire new questions and ways that don't... or do so to a much reduced degree. And this probably depends a little bit on the person, but clustering can be expected
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @TheAnnaGat @visakanv and
No. Just like one should move around a bit at a party and get a sense of what sort of conversations they like to have and what sort of people have the cadence/aesthetic they enjoy, people should move around books and connect organically
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @TheAnnaGat and
Different people will enjoy each other more or less at parties, but you'll still notice clustering around particular individuals that have a broadly enjoyable way of conversing and a much higher rate of interesting things to say. Same goes with books
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
It'd be silly for me to say, "Only talk to Person A, Person B, and Person C; otherwise, you're wasting your time!" but it may be useful for me to suggest *starting* with those people, given that they're having the sorts of conversations most people end up gravitating toward
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.