It wasn't until 1987 that the American Academy of Pediatrics explicitly recommended giving babies pain relief during surgical procedures. 1987!(!!!) Why? Parental outrage, initially kicked off by a mother whose infant received *open heart surgery* with no pain management.
-
Show this thread
-
Did all of these medical professionals really believe that babies felt no pain? How confident were they? Did they think about it often? How could they bring themselves to cut into tiny children, fully awake but paralyzed by muscle relaxants? Do they feel any guilt *now*?
2 replies 11 retweets 75 likesShow this thread -
Sometimes it seems utterly insane to me that educational professionals can look at a typical classroom and think "yes, this is what a childhood ought to be." But it's not insane. It's a standard feature of humans to be this recklessly unobservant when it suits you.
4 replies 36 retweets 233 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JackRabuck
Using anesthetic always adds significant risk to surgical procedures. We still use it whenever it's remotely feasible because to not do so would literally torture a human being. It's why we anesthetize adults, teenagers, children, and — now — babies.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Yes, as it is with adults, teenagers, and older children.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.