OMG this is so good --https://twitter.com/rrhoover/status/1071927319437094912 …
-
Yes, but more complicated. I think
@karaswisher's is a systemic approach too - she is very consistent - but it is linear or historical. She has a train on rails & the rails are changing.@sama says train has left rails and is now flying and we have to catch up, no other option.
It doesn't seem consistent to me? Like, right off the bat, I can't tell why she prefers Zuckerberg et al re: drawing the boundaries for speech on the major platforms — she careens between complaining about the power of white men & demanding they use it more decisively
-
-
It feels like two not very sophisticated rules of thumb "white men are bad" and "Zuckerberg is letting trolls run amok" colliding and resulting in a shower of not-quite-non-sequiturs
-
That is actually consistent. That's why I called her approach linear or historical: she applies "normal" corporate categories (cites NYTimes, being "CEO", etc.) Sam says these are new entities and both government and society have to adapt. Truth must be in the collision...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, her logic is that there is no difference between old & new “gatekeepers” which i strongly reject (so does Sam).
-
That's why I say the truth is in the middle. It would be also mad to think *no* corporate rule applies to a powerful tech company that behaves like a corporate. Actually, if you listen carefully,
@sama's position on this is quite centrist... - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.