OMG this is so good --https://twitter.com/rrhoover/status/1071927319437094912 …
Honestly can't get past Kara Swisher's near-constant point-scoring at the expense of allowing any linear conversation to progress past a few talking points. *Fascinating* topics, but not enough the requisite depth to really understand the points of disagreement
-
-
Agree, one has an optics and symbolism driven approach (which works to some extent in some cases), other is systems level thinking (which rejects replacing few inputs w seemingly obvious preferred inputs fixes core issues). “If only these nerds had taken a few humanities classes”
-
Yes, but more complicated. I think
@karaswisher's is a systemic approach too - she is very consistent - but it is linear or historical. She has a train on rails & the rails are changing.@sama says train has left rails and is now flying and we have to catch up, no other option. - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is like... argumentative edging? It is not my kink
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm more interested in this as GREAT showcase of two clear viewpoints (opposing, but still legitimately *debatable* in 2018): two smart ppl, two tangential interpretations of same reality, one linear & one exponential model of progress - two types of optimism. Very instructive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, so this. Had to quit her podcast because she can not stop interrupting the most interesting, thoughtful people in the world.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the most succinct description of Swisher I've ever read.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.