Every time someone says "don't worry, the big companies won't leave" due to e.g. SF's increasingly insane regulatory structure, start-ups should be hearing the silent "...but they'd be crazy to *start* here" at the end
-
-
Tougher to care if you think of "tech" as insta-twit-book + some VR stuff or whatever; it's easy to dismiss the value there... but, for example, if a really promising biotech firm is treating cancer, you want them to have unfettered access to capital & the best employable talent
-
I don't think that, but quite a bit of the valley tech startup infra does. Plenty of biotech (maybe most, though it isn't something I've looked at recently) happens elsewhere.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't know if the data proves that (but, don't know if doesn't). "Tech" covers a lot of ground (nearly every business and scientific endeavour now includes software). It can't all be in one, geographically bounded, region. Real estate prices alone are a limiting factor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Capital is not geographically bounded, even though many Valley investors behave as though it is. Talent is definitely not limited to the valley or even the US. pg wrote about it years ago, and I'm still unsure of the argument that SF is innately the right place for tech startups.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.