Recently thinking about effective sibling relationships wrt startups, e.g. @kimbal/@elonmusk & @patrickc/@collision. A natural, fully-trustworthy partner who’s easy to sync with = massive force multiplier, w/ compounding effects from childhood on?
-
Forget trusting/syncing w/siblings - I've always been a little perplexed at the lack of *identical twins* among really successful people. (There's a slight health/intelligence penalty being a twin, yes, but that doesn't seem remotely enough to explain the absence.)
-
-
Not sure. Coordination is overrated? Being different in a collaboration is in fact extremely important? One twin is, despite genetics/upbringing, still too likely to be a 'weakest link' and hold the other back/be jettisoned? Twinship itself destroys creativity/risk-taking?
-
Value of difference in preferences/abilities would be my guess. There are major welfare gains when one person on a team loves the (necessary) work the others hate. Sales vs engineering vs design is a good example in startups. Few enjoy all 3. Twins would overlap.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What about the Winklevoss Twins?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah, twins're rougher on mothers, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's bad for the twins. There's a lot of fetus/mother conflict and other things which means that something can be good for one and not the other. (As it happens, twins do pay a price but it seems to be small.)
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.