The European Court of Human Rights straight-up called a "right of others to have their religious feelings protected." Just like what are you doinghttps://twitter.com/AmarAmarasingam/status/1055522513042714625 …
-
Show this thread
-
-
-
I am genuinely entranced by the hoop-jumping required to justify fining a woman €480 for implying Muhammed was a pedophile just because he had sex with a childpic.twitter.com/gseRjEvQfM
5 replies 18 retweets 67 likesShow this thread -
Am I missing something here? Because it sure seems like the court is saying that taking a child bride doesn't imply pedophilic tendencies unless followed up by... divorce? abandonment?... when the child turns 18. Which would be work-of-art level stupid.
6 replies 3 retweets 56 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
I support American style freedom of expression. But the Austrian law was enacted not to protect Muslims but the Catholic Church.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BurntOutCase @webdevMason
I presume you are OK with someone saying that Christ was a bastard and Mary was an adulterer because obviously the Virgin birth is nonsense?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.