I'm not against redistribution, and I think it's safe to assume you, I, and Tyler would roughly agree on how to do it. I do think the "you are the global 1%" messaging implies a problem with wealth (and even relatively minor wealth!) & has screwed up a lot of EAs' thinking
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
FWIW, I strongly suggest all of the EA org leaders attend newcomer/first-timer get-togethers at EA events — when I did, I was thoroughly stunned (and dismayed) by the attitudes reflected there
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The most concerning one was that you have a moral obligation to take a job that you absolutely loathe if it is where your greatest comparative advantage in doing good lies. It is on you to find a way to survive it. There were no dissenters at a table of 6-8. I was floored.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @robertwiblin and
I can't recall how many were speaking in favor, nodding, etc., but I did push back by saying that such a strong moral obligation could lead to burnout & dramatically reduce the adoption of EA principles, but my arguments — as presented by me, anyway — didn't seem impactful
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @robertwiblin and
This conversation occurred at the end of the meet-up & was preceded by what I honestly think I can describe as the "what I plan to give up as an EA" olympics
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
This was something I thought HAD been adequately covered in EA literature, which is why I found the whole thing pretty stunning. IMO there are still important status-related norms around self-sacrifice that probably can't just be addressed via blog posts.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.