A more fundamental question is: what does EA recommend in cases where the most effective thing isn't altruistic?https://twitter.com/HumanProgress/status/1052850035673759744 …
-
Not to me either, but try it out with someone who has never done any moral philosophy. Promoting an ideology sucks as it always gets simplified as it spreads, then people hate on you for not having the fully sophisticated version in the name, or first paragraph. But
I mean, it certainly raises additional questions. It implies the need for further clarification on terms and discussion of downstream implications, edge cases, etc. But if you don't give your audience the real thing, it is *kind of* your fault when they don't have the real thing.
-
-
Don't agree. Often a simplified but less accurate version leads to more correct understanding in listeners than an accurate but complex version. But as I say I've been in favour of welfare + rights as the message, so not going to die on the hill that is was a bad idea.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.