Attachments argues that much of our "selfish" behavior contributes to economic growth & pro-growth norms, which ultimately make us better off in aggregate. But wise redistribution also does this, & insofar as we can make the world a greater cornucopia by moving money, we should!
-
Show this thread
-
IMO, you can read out of this a very nice personal philosophy — one where you try to live a productive life, contributing ideas & labor as you can, & giving to others who are trying to do the same but whose circumstances make an additional dollar more useful to them than to you.
3 replies 3 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
It's hard to pin it down exactly, but... Attachments is really not about limiting your sense of obligation to others, but to widening the scope of that obligation (to, for example, people living many hundreds of years from now) & serving that obligation through high productivity.
2 replies 1 retweet 27 likesShow this thread -
It’s difficult to appreciate the value of human lives which won’t be lived for many hundreds of years. Likewise, the value of lives already lived — lived without the gifts of growth even many of the poor among us can access: clean running water, heating/lighting, refrigerationpic.twitter.com/xTADR882d9
1 reply 3 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ Retweeted David Deutsch
Yes... this is a repeating theme for me, strangely converging across a few recent rabbit holes. What makes the world richer? Why does wealth compound? Ideas, which can be forgotten but not consumed away. When you get a good one, you usually get to keep it!https://twitter.com/DavidDeutschOxf/status/1052678945248878598 …
Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ added,
2 replies 1 retweet 22 likesShow this thread -
IMO, the moral isn't to grind yourself down either for the poorest (a potential failure mode for EAs) or for all civilization (a potential failure mode for the reader, perhaps). Maybe it's "find the awe in a *grand human tradition* & try to find your place in furthering it."
1 reply 6 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ Retweeted Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️
You could do worse than to spend your entire life in pursuit of good ideas to serve, either by promoting/spreading them OR by extending/revising them OR by executing on them. There are many paths to the thinker priesthood, and it needs youhttps://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/1047498394447429633 …
Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ added,
2 replies 7 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
Getting *really* tangential now, the book + this interview with
@tylercowen &@robertwiblin convinced me today to make a real go at quitting alcohol. (Today, coincidentally, marks 6 weeks without nicotine!)https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/tyler-cowen-stubborn-attachments/ …9 replies 1 retweet 59 likesShow this thread -
Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ Retweeted
With regard to the second tweet in this thread,
@juliagalef and@robertwiblin disagree with my claim that EA is "essentially about" redistribution. I suspect most EAs do consider redistribution essential to EA's philosophical core, but I leave it to you https://twitter.com/robertwiblin/status/1052715779936776193 …Mason 🏃♂️ ✂️ added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Hm, is it a sample issue? EA circles that I frequent don't put remotely such emphasis on redistribution. I think inequality is a negative externality (somewhat), but many in my sample would associate redistribution with INeffective altruism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
How are you defining "redistribution"?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.