You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I suspect the majority of self-described EAs (not just leaders) would also disagree with your claim. Long-termism (GCRs and otherwise) and animal welfare have been major, well-established parts of EA for years and are widely discussed in EA forums.
Animal welfare is *entirely* redistributive, it's just that the recipients aren't human. There's a whole mishmash of stuff constituting Far Future, but that's still an EA edge that the movement as a whole feels weird about, which is why the central EA books tend to sideline it.
I can see a case for counting animal welfare as "redistributive", but usually people use that word to talk about redistributing wealth to other humans, so IMO this usage is a little misleading.
Fair; I'm trying to do a lot with 280 characters! I'm trying to point at the long-standing "redivide the pie" vs. "grow the pie" debate, and I don't think causes like animal welfare (or, indeed, most traditional philanthropy) exist outside that — or *can* exist outside that.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
